learning rate schedule
Appendices for: Gradient-based Hyperparameter Optimization Over Long Horizons Paul Micaelli University of Edinburgh {paul.micaelli}@ed.ac.uk Amos Storkey University of Edinburgh {a.storkey }@ed.ac.uk
Now we return to the second part of (9). This illustrates how tight the upper bound is. We use a GeForce RTX 2080 Ti GPU for all experiments. Instead, we always carve out a validation set from our training set. Figure 1 The batch size is set to 128, and 1000 fixed images are used for the validation data. Here we provide the raw hypergradients corresponding to the outer optimization shown in Appendices: Figure 1.
62000dee5a05a6a71de3a6127a68778a-AuthorFeedback.pdf
We appreciate the reviewers' time and suggestions! We address them all and report new experimental results below. Although DIH can be helpful to identify noisy data in noisy-label setting (ref.Middle plot in Figure 1), DIHCL still achieves 90.34% test-set accuracy under 40% symmetric label noise on CIFAR10 (ref.Top plot in Figure 1). The statement may be revised that "updating in-6 Is the method specific to cyclic learning rate... DI-23 HCL is applicable to other learning rate schedules. We report the result of DIHCL with a piecewise exponential decay learning rate in Figure 1.
Appendices for: Gradient-based Hyperparameter Optimization Over Long Horizons Paul Micaelli University of Edinburgh {paul.micaelli}@ed.ac.uk Amos Storkey University of Edinburgh {a.storkey }@ed.ac.uk
Now we return to the second part of (9). This illustrates how tight the upper bound is. We use a GeForce RTX 2080 Ti GPU for all experiments. Instead, we always carve out a validation set from our training set. Figure 1 The batch size is set to 128, and 1000 fixed images are used for the validation data. Here we provide the raw hypergradients corresponding to the outer optimization shown in Appendices: Figure 1.
Decoupled Relative Learning Rate Schedules
Ludziejewski, Jan, Małaśnicki, Jan, Pióro, Maciej, Krutul, Michał, Ciebiera, Kamil, Stefaniak, Maciej, Krajewski, Jakub, Sankowski, Piotr, Cygan, Marek, Adamczewski, Kamil, Jaszczur, Sebastian
In this work, we introduce a novel approach for optimizing LLM training by adjusting learning rates across weights of different components in Transformer models. Traditional methods often apply a uniform learning rate across all network layers, potentially overlooking the unique dynamics of each part. Remarkably, our introduced relative learning rates, RLRS, method accelerates the training process by up to $23\%$, particularly in complex models such as Mixture of Experts (MoE). Hyperparameters of RLRS can be efficiently tuned on smaller models and then effectively reused on models up to $27\times$ larger. This simple and effective method results in a substantial reduction in training time and computational resources, offering a practical and scalable solution for optimizing large-scale neural networks.